A general practitioner in ten reluctance compared to vaccination. This is what reveals the investigation conducted online with 1,069 practitioners by the French Society of medicine General (SMFG) and unveiled by Thursday, September 29 The Parisien .
This study, which received funding “without consideration” of industry pharmaceutical, details the nature of “brakes” to vaccination in these health professionals. Its publication comes as “citizen dialogue” on means of respond the rise of distrust in respect of vaccination launched in January by the Ministry of health, should finish by the end of the year.
presence of adjuvant, safety and usefulness of the HPV vaccine against HPV, vaccines combined, etc: unsurprisingly, the “brakes” to vaccination among physicians identified are the same as those found in the debate public and which had already been pointed by a study of the research, studies, evaluation and statistics (Drees) in March 2015.
sign that the distrust does not spare health professionals, a doctor interviewed in four (24%) said have an adverse opinion on the presence of adjuvant (mainly aluminum salts) in vaccines.
Please avoid time-consuming argument
If some vaccines elicit an almost total adhesion (95% for tetanus), others crystallize doubts. Nearly one in three practitioner does not see the benefit for the community of use HPV vaccine against human papillomavirus, which aims to prevent cancers of the cervix . One in three (35%) also finds that “the time to follow address and explain” This vaccine does not encourage the propose .
Faced with a patient refusal, so it is sometimes easier not to return in a time-consuming argument. A quarter of the surveyed GPs ensures not insist when a patient is reluctant. A proportion that passes half for the HPV vaccine.
“When the doctor is defensive situation and he has to negotiate he knows it’s going to him take time and complicate organizing his day “ is argue Dr. Luc Martinez, vice president of SMFG and scientific director of the study. “The doctors were not prepared for this type of situation, some find themselves destabilized” he adds.
Another finding of the study: the weight of the information conveyed by the media or social networks . A third (33%) of the GPs considered that the content of the information provided by the media is “bad or very bad” vaccination. A percentage that exceeds half (56%) for papillomavirus infections.
At his hearing on Friday 30 September by the steering committee of citizen conferencing, SMFG will ask the government of “to facilitate the organization and information” general practitioners.
First, by allowing the practitioner to easily knowledge of the “vaccination history” of his patients. Secondly, by launching a communication campaign towards health professionals and patients to “popularize the science of vaccination remember the utility and safety of adjuvants and deconstruct the vaccination-related prejudice to give the confidence to all stakeholders. “